Ink

As one of the only people I know (in my generation, granted) who never went down the road of getting tattooed or pierced, I’ve often wondered what I would want said or shown if I were to get a tattoo. I feel much too old now to ever do such a thing, but I must admit that I admire people who have meaningful tattoos and still love themselves for them. It shows confidence, conviction and character to visually advertise your passions and beliefs.

There are some who regret their tattoos – indeed a few people I know were admittedly young, naive or intoxicated when they got theirs. Two of my core beliefs, however, are a) to live without regret, and b) that everything happens for a reason – therefore getting a tattoo ought to have represented a lot of thought, or at least accurately represented your character at the time, and thus you should not feel shame. For that is who you were, and if you are different now, perhaps that act and your guilt caused a paradigm shift in your self-belief. Therefore who you are now was critically informed by your earlier immature self.

Anyway, such a permanent decision for someone like me nowadays incites an imperative that it would have to be exceptionally meaningful. And it would also show a perceived immaturity which is not representative of myself now. As you get older, a tattoo’s permanence (whether new or old) weighs down even heavier.

Regardless, for fun I often give thought to what I would get. Something to do with sport? I’ve golfed all my life. I have found new passions in rowing and cycling. But who knows for how long? How silly would it feel to explain something in 10 years that was meaningful for one or two years of my life? What about wine? While yes, I am passionate about the industry and am neck-deep in it professionally, I am no wine geek compared to my peers and do not purport to be.

So how about core philosophies or matras? This angle might be more my style. My wife found this (I think) or came up with it herself, and has it on a post-it note on her bulletin board. Somehow this was instantly meaningful and representative and I still often gaze upon it in times of needing purpose or direction.

Learns
Overcomes
Becomes

I’m not sure how you would appropriately graphically represent this flowing statement, however.

And not to worry, folks, I have zero percent chance of following through. I think it’s more of a mental exercise to propose such a commitment, rather than actually proceed with it. Because, as I said, it’s permanent.

The Ride to Conquer Cancer – update

In my previous post, I published a letter that I had sent to the Ride To Conquer Cancer, its charity the BC Cancer Foundation, as well as a handful of BC media outlets.

I am happy to report that it did not go unnoticed.

A few days ago, I received this reply from BC Cancer Foundation CEO Mr. Douglas Nelson:

Thank you for contacting the BC Cancer Foundation (we have also received your message through the BC Ride to Conquer Cancer office). We appreciate the time you have taken to write your letter and outline your concerns regarding sponsorship of the Ride to Conquer Cancer.

I would like to begin by sharing that our 2013 Ride is the final year of a three-year national sponsorship agreement, that we are a part of, with Enbridge. The concerns you have addressed are noted and appreciated. We understand the importance of the discussions happening here in our province and across the country regarding Enbridge, their pipeline proposal and its impact.

At this time, we are listening to our donors and event participants who are providing input, as you have, on this sponsorship. Your letter will help to shape our discussions moving forward.

To date the BC Ride to Conquer Cancer has raised an amazing $39.1 million dollars thanks to the support of thousands of riders and generous donors. And we can confirm that one-hundred per cent of these funds raised goes directly to the BC Cancer Foundation to support cancer research and enhancements to patient care at the BC Cancer Agency.

I hope this background information is helpful to you. We also hope you will consider supporting the BC Cancer Foundation in other ways.

This morning I sent Mr. Nelson a quick reply.
Thank you for your response to my email and apologies for my late reply.
I am very happy to hear that you and your organization are sensitive to my concerns, which are very likely widely shared, and that it will contribute to a basis of consideration as you decide upon a new sponsor.
Your foundation and the Ride to Conquer Cancer galvanize our community in very special and tender ways and it is incumbent upon you and the Ride’s organizers to think and act wholesomely on behalf of your principles and those of British Columbia’s. It sounds like you are mindful of such details. This is great news.
I will pay keen attention to your search for a new National Title Sponsor, and will be among the first to sign up for future Rides To Conquer Cancer depending on your selection.
Best wishes in your continued work and thank you again for reaching out to a concerned stakeholder in the fight against cancer.

All told, I am satisfied that they are at least listening, and that the foundation hasn’t employed blinders in the form of hundred-dollar-bills – unable to see anything save for the money.

Stay tuned for new sponsorship information in the months ahead. God willing, a far more reasonable and altruistic sponsor will be found and the Foundation will have discovered in me a new advocate and participant.

The Enbridge? Ride to Conquer Cancer

Earlier today I wrote and submitted a letter to the organizers of the Ride To Conquer Cancer over their current National Title Sponsor: Enbridge. I also sent my letter to the news departments of the CBC, CTV News and The Globe and Mail.

I am related to many cancer fighters – winners and losers – and would like to take part in this symbolic and significant fundraising event, however with the involvement of Enbridge, I simply cannot do so. Why, you ask? I believe there is a sad irony and conflict of interests at play: the sponsor’s business of health-impacting oil pipelines and environmental degradation versus The Ride To Conquer Cancer’s proposed core value of fighting cancer.

Enbridge’s participation is not terribly different, although less bold, from having a cigarette manufacturer as National Title Sponsor.

In the town of Terrace today, the local newspaper outlined how finalists and the winner of a Chamber of Commerce award sponsored by Enbridge all declined to accept on the grounds of a similar conflict. http://www.terracestandard.com/news/181001941.html

From the ‘winning’ organization, Skeena Wild Conservation Trust said, “It’s very clear that Enbridge is using sponsorship of community events as a public relations tool to help gain social licence for its project,” said Skeena Wild’s Julia Hill. “We are not interested in being a pawn in their PR game.”

Given the popularity of the annual Ride To Conquer Cancer and the overwhelming debate concerning Enbridge, I wanted to raise this issue with organizers and local media, to investigate Enbridge’s penetrating PR effort to earn favour amongst British Columbians.

My letter:

Dear Ride To Conquer Cancer Team,

I would like to take a brief opportunity to write you and share my concern and disappointment with your choice of National Title Sponsor, Enbridge.

First, I would like to reassure you that I am not a member of an ‘interest group’, nor a random, anonymous individual with a social agenda, nor a flamer who lobs grenades from behind the safety of his computer screen. I am a fairly normal 33 year-old who manages a successful company in Vancouver, and is a married, tax-paying homeowner with a dog and has a mother who successfully fought and won against Leukemia 3 years ago.

This year I took up road cycling in a fairly serious fashion and have fallen head over heels for the activity and its resultant fitness and camaraderie with fellow cyclists.

I am very supportive and proud of your event’s efforts and your faithful organizers. I know your values and goals are sincere. I truly believe that each of you works incredibly hard to put together a strong event with wonderful aspirations for fundraising and community in a collective effort to contribute to the fight against cancer. Being the son of a cancer survivor, as well as nephew to an uncle who last year fought prostate cancer, and an aunt who a few years ago unfortunately did not survive ovarian cancer, I find your cause noble and close to my heart.

However, this does not and I feel cannot supersede my disappointment with the status of Enbridge as your National Title Sponsor. I firmly, unequivocally believe it is a massive disservice to your efforts to have Enbridge involved in any capacity. As a result, I will not participate in, nor recommend, your Ride To Conquer Cancer.

My concerns are two-fold:

1) Enbridge is currently embroiled in one of British Columbia’s greatest debates about the creation of an oil pipeline from Alberta’s oilsands to the west coast. Pulling every oilsands trick in the book, they are hiring the best public relations spin-doctors in the industry to persuade and convince British Columbians and First Nations that their effort is worthwhile, harmless and in fact beneficial. This includes sponsoring events like yours. They are manipulating perspectives to frame the conversation as an economic driver without any regard for potential (inevitable) environmental and health-related consequences.

Moreover, it is becoming clear that Enbridge is pouring money into events and festivals such as yours to endear themselves to a wide-ranging public to further their agendas. In essence, your event, staff and cyclists are participants, unwilling or otherwise, in their efforts. I have seen it for myself. A close friend intends to ride on behalf of a relative, in spite of Enbridge’s involvement, which is precisely the attitude Enbridge wishes to foster.

Relating to their distasteful involvement in community events, a story emerged on November 27 about a Terrace Chamber of Commerce award sponsored by Enbridge which was to be given to Skeena Wild Conservation Trust – a local environmental group. Fortunately the group was wise to the act:

“The company behind a contentious oil pipeline project has no place sponsoring a local environmental award according to the organization which won, but declined to accept it,” states the Terrace Standard newspaper. “‘It’s very clear that Enbridge is using sponsorship of community events as a public relations tool to help gain social license for its project. We are not interested in being a pawn in their PR game,’” stated Skeena’s representative.

2) More directly relevant is Enbridge’s history of accidents and environmental catastrophe, which may inadvertently yet directly propagate cancer. Enbridge’s 2010 Keystone Pipeline disaster in Michigan, which poured 3 million litres of oil into wetlands and on to peoples’ property, went unchecked for nearly a day. Rather than admit fault, in the days following they claimed they’d followed all protocols and that they’d dealt with the spill quickly and effectively – eventually determined to be inaccurate. The cleanup continues to this day and nearby residents have complained of headaches, nausea and dizziness. Many have had their properties bought out due to an inability to clean up the mess and required decades of natural healing. Imagine the health issues – near and long term – if one were to drink the water in that river, or children to play on its banks? Could it lead to cancer? An educated guess might be yes.

Additionally, an increasing number of communities in Alberta that surround or are downstream of the oilsands are now fighting inexplicable health concerns that they and independent researchers believe are related to oilsands development. Cancer-causing poisons like mercury and thallium are being found in high concentrations in places like Athabasca, which scientists are tying directly to oilsands development, and Enbridge is a significant participant.

As a born-and-raised Calgarian who uprooted his family and moved to Vancouver two years ago to engage in a more wholesome lifestyle where citizens are actively concerned about their health and environment and intently care about each other, I find the efforts of Enbridge to saturate BC with its Alberta- styled ‘economy-trumps-environment’ propaganda to be very invasive and disgusting. Furthermore, I believe it is against our communal core values.

Our provincial motto has long been, “Super Natural British Columbia.” I want to keep BC super and natural, and I believe it would be to the benefit of your values and the fight against cancer that you reconsider your choice of Enbridge as National Title Sponsor.

Referenced articles:

The Terrace Standard, November 27,
2012: http://www.terracestandard.com/news/181001941.html
The Globe and Mail, July 10, 2012: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on- business/industry-news/energy-and-resources/enbridge-slammed-for-keystone- kops-response-to-michigan-spill/article4402752/
New York Times, August 20,
2012: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/21/opinion/the-dangers-of-diluted- bitumen-oil.html
CBC News, August 30,
2012: http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/story/2010/08/30/oil-sands-athabasca- river.html

An Exercise in Redundancy – The Value of Blog

Image

I’ve been wrestling with the idea of whether or not to continue my blog.

There. I said it. It’s out in the world, for all to hear.

But to, in fact, anyone?

The world is a fast-changing, and vastly-changed place since I started this blog only a few short years ago. I mean, say it out loud: “BLOG.” Sounds almost as ancient as “WALKMAN,” or “CASSETTE TAPE” (sorry, kids).

Since this blog was conceived community-thingies like Facebook and Twitter have prevailed and grown faster than February moss on a west-coast cedar. I now find most of my musings taking place on those forums instead of here on this blog, probably due more to a sense of convenience, brevity and the pleasure of immediate and visible interaction with my desired audience: my friends and peers. I have little idea who my audience is here. I know it’s not large, but who you are, precisely, largely escapes me.

Combine these factors with a significant decline in my personal time with which to write, and the idea of “updating my blog” seems frustrating, stressful and entirely daunting.

So the question becomes, what with the consequences of time constraints, and the conveniences of alternative, more widely-adopted, contemporary social media options, is there value in continuing this blog?

If so, what should it become?

Blogs require purpose. My artistic friends post music, photography, writing and recipes on their blogs. These are the perfect venues for such things. Me? Just rambling, and that might be better (or best) suited to the aforementioned publicly traded communities.

I look forward to your responses. A lack of responses will be equally telling.

The Return; Minus a Few Spare Parts

Toulleries & Louvre, Paris

(click for big – this one I’m really proud of)

 

We’re back from our epic (to us) 21 day trip to Europe. We got home yesterday at about 4pm, suffered through 3 hours of laundry and a quick bite of neighbourhood sushi, and then were in bed at 6:45pm last night. Up at 5am today.

As you followed, the first ten days were in Italy – Tuscany, Florence, Barolo…

Then, as we arrived in Paris to begin the ten day French leg of our journey, the blog went silent. Well, I have three good reasons why:

- France and its 2,700 km adventure were work-related, and the schedule was horrendous. Up no later than 7 each day and in bed no sooner than midnight each night. Add in the travel via bus, team of 30 that travelled with me, plus meals and wine. Exhaustion reigned.

- blogging by iPad is not fun. The typing is not easy, though manageable; but add to this infrequent wi-fi connections and inopportune hours to write.

- I lost my iPhone 4S in a taxi-cab on our 2nd night in Paris. Just happened to be wearing trousers with shallow pockets (as is apparently the design these days – thanks Etro) and had a certain someone on my lap as we fit more than enough people in the vehicle… We scurried out once back at our hotel that night and away went my phone, not noticed for an hour, and by then way too late to do anything about. For two hours I called various French taxi numbers, but the receipt left no idea of what company it was, nor a contact number. So I was shooting in the dark.

Thus, with little time and no camera that could instantly upload to my photo stream, the blog concept was abandoned. I was only mad/frustrated/down for a day or two. I hate (read: HATE) losing things, since I have a streak of OCD in me. While a phone can be replaced, I think of it more as a knock against myself: my ability to control things around me and my own destiny. It drives (and indeed drove) me crazy. But I got over it.

The only other thing I lost was one of the two plug-in adaptors for Europe, which were $2.97 each, and we were able to get by with one, so no big deal really, though an expletive or two might have been aired at the time.

Otherwise France was great. I will update more soon, once the cobwebs of a full day of travel and 8 hour time difference are cleared, not to mention the mountain of “due tomorrow” work in front of me.

Wine Tasting in the Piemonte

The last two days we’ve spent touring around the Barolo, Barbaresco and Alba regions: all part of what they call the Piemonte area of northwestern Italy. This was sort of the point of this trip (as previously discussed): get to know the regions that are responsible for some of our favourite and least understood wines.

Before leaving I had arranged visits to three top producers of Barbaresco and Barolo, one of whom we have drunk before and two which are astronomically expensive and collectible (we’d never buy them, so why not visit and taste instead?).

On Monday we visited La Spinetta, a forward thinking producer based near Neive in Barbaresco. We got the typical tour that is interesting to most people but to geeks like me, well let’s just say I’ve seen a lot of barrels, and yes they use French oak, and yes harvest takes place in October, etc. etc. The usual. We were matched up with some Americans from Texas, who we quickly found out perfectly suited the arrogant, entitled, spoiled reputation that stains the common American Tourist when visiting abroad. Lines like, “they [the wineries] know how much we spent to get here, so they should open their doors for us” when referring to wineries that don’t accept visits, and “what’s your best, I want to taste that.” Their resentment was palpable when they discovered that my wife and I were visiting the top wineries, for whom I had to pull some serious strings to gain access to.

We visited the winery Bruno Giacosa in the afternoon, and while not as polished as the Spinetta visit, we were privately toured around by Francesco: an apprenticing winemaker no more than 25 years old, and I was able to ask him all sorts of deeper questions about fruit sourcing and organics, etc. that I couldn’t rattle off in front of others before. The philosophy and style of the wines were very different – subtle, elegant and refined in comparison to the brute force
and upfront nature of Spinetta. We met the famous viticulturalist at Giacosa (Dante is his first name) and Bruno’s wife, who was the quintessential generous hostess, but very obviously a determined and decisive personality. They were busy arguing with Italian media while we were at a different table and taken through a wide range of wines including a spumante (sparkling), Arneis (intriguing local white varietal), Dolcetto, Barbaresco Asili and a Barolo. Delicious stuff.

We discovered a bit later on that Giacosa seems to not enjoy a good reputation or confidence of many Italians (or at least those we met in the local enotecas). Some of the gruffness we were offered referred to Giacosa’s buying of fruit from growers instead of owning property, and quality issues… Quite shocking resentment given his international reputation.

Today, we visited one of the most important wineries in Italy: Gaja. Located in the heart of the village of Barbaresco, Gaja is an institution. Into their fourth generation of family ownership, Gaja is responsible for creating a cult-like status for high end barolos and barbarescos, whose own wines typically sell for upwards of $400 and older vintages often sell in auctions at Christies or Sotheby’s.

The opportunity to see the establishment was memorable and appreciated, including for the company that we kept along the way. We toured with a wine club of 12 people from Belgium. Very pleasant folks all of them, and we learned through a rather funny conversation about the length of a blue pen that three of the men were retired Pfizer salesmen: think Jake Gyllenhaal in Love & Other Drugs.

A quick lunch at a Barbaresco trattoria included my vegetarian wife ordering a massive plate of meat by accident (not quite as solid on the Italian menu items as she thought) and a local specialty for me: veal raviolis in a butter and sage sauce. Delish.

We returned to the delightful town of Alba afterwards and took advantage of the truly great shopping to find my wife some fantastic new shirts and accessories. Love the authentic shopping in Alba and shared my enthusiasm in French with one of the shop owners.

Afterwards it was back to the guesthouse in Barolo and then for a quick and delicious pizza up the hill in La Morra. Just what we wanted: something simple and easy. Funnily, we’ve found that everyone here wants you to dine the Michelin way as often as possible. Our hosts in Barolo continue to recommend Michelin starred restaurants at every opportunity, and all the tourists we meet (including the Belgians) revel in dining at them routinely. I don’t get it. Sure, they’re the best offerings of food in the region, but you pay accordingly at upwards of 200 euro per person. And they’re not representative of the local offerings – the residents never eat there, and the meals are never short of 2 hours. We had a Michelin star meal in Florence and yes, it was good, but not necessarily the best bang for buck on the trip so far. We’ve enjoyed the more authentic, spontaneous and simple meals in Barolo, much to the dismay of our hosts.

Tomorrow we are off to Paris to begin the French half of our trip via Milan suburban airport Malpensa. We will do a drive-by of Torino and stop for lunch, before heading to Milan. We are flying Easyjet which is one of those low-cost airlines…. Can’t wait to report to you how that experience goes. If successful, I’ll report to you from Paris tomorrow night and I’ll have my wife and luggage nearby. Here’s hoping!

20120516-005309.jpg

20120516-005327.jpg

20120516-005418.jpg

20120516-005443.jpg

20120516-005502.jpg

20120516-005521.jpg

20120516-005536.jpg

20120516-005614.jpg

20120516-005644.jpg

20120516-005700.jpg

A Full Day in Barolo, plus Alba and Asti

Our first full day in Barolo is almost up and we still have three more days here, yet we are already talking about returning.

Beyond beautiful, this region is truly majestic. I had no understanding of this region beforehand, so no expectations, and I have become entirely enamoured. We can’t understand why it isn’t more well-known and visited by millions, but rest assured we have no issues reveling in the privacy!

The sweeping hillside and views from our ultra-modern, 9-room guesthouse never cease to amaze us. And despite the overcast conditions today (a welcome abbreviation in the 30C weather throughout the trip so far) we remain breathless.

We took it fairly easy today, driving 35 km to the town of Alba. It is a delightful little town, reminiscent of Whistler, but quite a bit bigger. A main promenade features attractive shops with Italian clothing (more of what I’d expected to see in Florence), wine and several cafes and restaurants.

Seeking simpler food (and not one of the ultra-luxe 18 Michelin star restaurants in this little town – Canada has none by the way) we visited an ‘eno-cafe’ that was recommended by our fantastic guesthouse hosts. There we had a delicious and simple pasta lunch in its brick-walled cellar room, along with some Barbera d’Asti. Afterwards we walked the town and remarked at how enjoyable of a place it is.

Afterwards we drove to Asti, about 20 km further down the highway. Asti is far less remarkable, much more rustic and workmanlike, and without exiting the car we soon left to head back to our accommodations for a relaxing evening.

Tonight we’re considering dinner in the nearby village of La Morra, but have two bottles of Moscato d’Asti in our fridge and some great food options prepared by our hosts. Ah, decisions, decisions…

As always, click the pics for bigger versions!

20120513-201319.jpg

20120513-201339.jpg

20120513-201355.jpg

20120513-201426.jpg